Red State Renegade

August 22, 2008

Eisenhower’s grandaughter leaves lifelong party

Filed under: Republican, McCain, Rove @ 3:13 pm

eisenhower.jpg
…Citing disgust with today’s GOP:

My decision came at the end of last week when it was demonstrated to the nation that McCain and this Bush White House have learned little in the last five years. They mishandled what became a crisis in the Caucusus, and this has undermined U.S. national security. At the same time, the McCain camp appears to be comfortable with running an unworthy Karl Rove–style political campaign. Will the McCain operation, and its sponsors, do anything to win?

August 12, 2008

Price of Oil to continue rising

Filed under: Oil @ 2:47 pm

crude-prices-1970-2008.jpg

Don’t rejoice in lower oil prices just yet. Enjoy them, but don’t count on them.

Rises and drops are always attributed to news events by politicians and the media. When Katrina was about to hit, I wrote here that oil would soon be breaking the $70 mark (regardless of storm damage), but that it would be blamed on the upcoming hurricane (of course, no one knew how serious Katrina would be). At the time, there was much discussion about $70 being a giant ‘psychological barrier,’ just as there was epic discussion later on about the $100 barrier.

What history shows is that these ‘psychological barriers’ are just bullshit terms for the pundits and politicians to toss around, and that in reality they don’t exist. The price of oil drives it’s own path based on the primary factors of supply & demand - just the way commodities are supposed to work.

The graph above shows that while events do cause temporary moves in energy prices, there is a long term trend that is much simpler to explain. It has no relation to ‘psychological barriers’ or wishful thinking.

The next big barrier they will talk about will, of course, be $200. Don’t kid yourself - we may be looking back shortly at the good old days of $140 oil. The president of OPEC warned of $200 oil recently, and Goldman Sachs has announced that oil could exceed $200 in the next two years.

And remember, the ‘experts’ have consistently misjudged the price of oil for years:

May 18, 2008

California Supreme Court upholds civil rights, declares gay marriage legal!

Filed under: Courts, marriage @ 1:01 am

bride.jpg

San Francisco partied and celebrated as the California Supreme court bitch slapped the ‘family-values’ crowd:

“The constitutionally based right to marry properly must be understood to encompass the core set of basic substantive legal rights and attributes traditionally associated with marriage that are so integral to an individual’s liberty and personal autonomy that they may not be eliminated or abrogated by the Legislature or by the electorate through the statutory initiative process. These core substantive rights include, most fundamentally, the opportunity of an individual to establish — with the person with whom the individual has chosen to share his or her life — an officially recognized and protected family possessing mutual rights and responsibilities and entitled to the same respect and dignity accorded a union traditionally designated as marriage.”

“…Furthermore, in contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individual’s capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual’s sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual’s sexual orientation — like a person’s race or gender — does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights.”

Important stuff to say the least.

20 years from now, civilized people will look back on these times and say ‘What the Fuck?’…But more importantly, they will look at this the way civilized people look back on the struggle for equal rights for black people now - hiring practices, voting, restaurant seating, Rosa parks on the bus, etc. - even the ability to play professional sports.

And we as a people (or maybe just our children) will wonder how we could have been so fucked up…

Modern day genius The Rude Pundit summed up the ruling in so many less words:

“In other words, this is family values in the real world, not in some backwards ass context where, oodles of evidence to the contrary, only straight couples can somehow raise kids who don’t want to, say, shoot up schools or rape dogs or whatever shit taint-licking fundamentalists believe.

“…Or, in the real world, stop being such assholes. A cocksucker marrying another cocksucker ain’t gonna stop your wife from sucking your cock. And if your daughters want to suck cock, gay marriage won’t halt them and they can even marry the guy attached to the sucked cock. And if your sons want to suck cock, well, now, in California, they can even marry the guy attached to the sucked cock. Everyone wins.”

Crazy Mofo Republican uses ‘Tar Baby’ term in memo about Obama

Filed under: Republican, Obama @ 12:30 am

watermelon.jpg

Rep. Tom Davis (R-Va.), in a 20 page memo on GOP election issues, used the term in a paragraph about Obama and Immigration:

“Remember, Hispanic voters are a swing group in this election and future elections. John McCain, being from a border state, may be out of sync with many Republicans but he has standing among Hispanics. Barrack Obama has not made the sale to Hispanic voters. Thus, this issue is a tar baby for anyone who touches it, with land mines everywhere.”

I actually love hearing this shit. These guys are so lost they will continue burying themselves…

May 11, 2008

What the fuck Hillary?

Filed under: Election 2008, cunt @ 2:44 am

Also known as:
PLEASE FUCKING GIVE IT UP HILLARY!

From Hillary’s letter today, to the Obama campaign, about seating the democratic delegates from Michigan and Florida:

One of the foremost principles of our party is that citizens be allowed to vote and that those votes be counted. That principle is not currently being applied to the nearly 2.5 million people who voted in primaries in Florida and Michigan

Ummm ok….

Here is the NY times article from fall 2007, which discussed the breaking of the democratic primary rules by Michigan and Florida, and their resulting penalties, agreed to by all 3 major democratic candidates:

“Three of the major Democratic presidential candidates on Saturday pledged not to campaign in Florida, Michigan and other states trying to leapfrog the 2008 primary calendar, a move that solidified the importance of the opening contests of Iowa and New Hampshire.”

This is so important - please email me if you really need to see the pledge or the NYT article, or if the links above aren’t working…

UPDATE: it gets crazier!

Hardly mentioned is the fact that all 3 major democratic candidates signed a pledge last fall not to campaign in those states trying to jump ahead of the Democratic primary calendar rules (specifically, Florida and Michigan).

Then, from the Hillary Clinton Website, on the DNC nominating calendar, from 9/07:

Clinton Campaign Statement on the Four State Pledge

The following is a statement by Clinton Campaign Manager Patti Solis Doyle.

“We believe Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina play a unique and special role in the nominating process.
And we believe the DNC’s rules and its calendar provide the necessary structure to respect and honor that role.
Thus, we will be signing the pledge to adhere to the DNC approved nominating calendar.”

April 30, 2008

Quote of the day

Filed under: Middle East, Media @ 8:13 am

Middle East expert Juan Cole on the newly exposed Pentagon campaign to influence military ‘experts’ on television (see previous post) to paint a more rosy picture of military operations:

“You always suspected these things about corporate media coverage of Iraq, but seeing it in cold black and white is bracing. I have more than once been put opposite some sunshine peddler on radio or television and wondered whether the person was on the take”

April 28, 2008

The Ant and The Grasshopper

Filed under: shortage @ 5:37 pm

ant_gh.gif

So you think the cost of filling your tank is outrageous? Wait until your next trip to the supermarket…

Food prices are accelerating faster than a Vectrix electric scooter. The price of wheat doubled in just two months this year.

With that in mind, this fable from Ancient Greece is more relevant than ever:

The Ant and the Grasshopper

In a field one summer’s day a Grasshopper was hopping about, chirping and singing to its heart’s content. An Ant passed by, bearing along with great toil an ear of corn he was taking to the nest.

“Why not come and chat with me,” said the Grasshopper, “instead of toiling and moiling in that way?”

“I am helping to lay up food for the winter,” said the Ant, “and recommend you to do the same.”

“Why bother about winter?” said the Grasshopper; we have got plenty of food at present.” But the Ant went on its way and continued its toil. When the winter came the Grasshopper had no food and found itself dying of hunger, while it saw the ants distributing every day corn and grain from the stores they had collected in the summer. Then the Grasshopper knew:

It is best to prepare for the days of necessity.

April 27, 2008

Quotes from Iraq Veterans Against the War

Filed under: Iraq, Afghanistan, War on Terror @ 12:04 pm

iraqchild.jpg

Iraq Veterans spoke out last month on what they saw and were expected to do in Iraq and Afghanistan, recalling being put into immoral and illegal situations:

Soldiers spoke out at an event sponsored by Vietnam Veterans Against The War:

On the initial invasion:
“There were massive amounts of artillery strikes before we even invaded. We saw the results of that. Streets full of bodies – women and children – body parts, extremely indiscriminate. I’m talking about rolling through villages here, not military encampments.”

“I still believed everything we were force-fed: weapons of mass destruction and possibly even a nuclear weapon. We felt, like, we’re going to go in, overthrow this evil dictator and give these people some peace, finally. We thought we were doing a good thing.”

On home raids:
“Usually it was based on a tip – we’re told someone in the home is an insurgent. We would pick up people who had nothing to do with anything, keep them locked up until they came up with something.”

“We kick down the door and all we find are a few women holding babies and a couple of kids. We were ordered to take the babies away and put sandbags on the women’s heads, tie their hands behind their backs, put them on their knees facing the wall. Here I am zip-tying these women, and my buddy is standing next to me holding these babies asking what do I do with these kids? We stood there, like, oh shit, what do we do? The squad leader came in and shouted, ‘Everybody is bagged and tagged – everybody!’ So we did it.”

On interrogations:
“That’s not something I want on my conscience.”

On the very common ‘Shovel order:’
“Anyone carrying a shovel or any sort of implement that could be used to bury an IED could be considered a target…After dark, you can shoot anyone who is outside. Or anyone who puts anything on the side of the road can be considered a target. You won’t find it in writing, but it’s an order indicated to soldiers.”

On accountability:
“(Our commander) made it clear to us that if an innocent person was shot he would stage a scene to protect us”.

On the Haditha Massacre, when 24 unarmed Iraqi civilians, some women and children were killed by angry U.S. soldiers, after losing their brothers in an IED attack:
“My squad was doing medivacs out of the town. I was not there to witness the shooting, but I know many marines who were.”

“I have a lot of feelings about this incident. A friend of mine from my first two tours was in that squad. He was the guy they gave immunity to to testify against the squad leader.”

“The people on the ground are looking at serious prison time. Like life. The people who were giving orders were only relieved of command. And I don’t think that’s right.”

The Haditha massacre, us ugly as it sounds, was not an isolated incident:
“It’s the one that just happened to be uncovered.”

On the Abu Gharaib abuses (after describing some inhumane hazing incidents routinely performed on fellow soldiers):
“What happened at Abu Ghraib is those orders came from the top. If the policy makers and the commanders can dehumanise their own troops, why wouldn’t they dehumanise the Iraqi people?”

On the mission and the war against terror:
“Everything that we were doing seemed almost designed to create more terrorists. To turn people against America. I couldn’t understand how we were liberating anyone. But I could understand how an Afghan person who was ambivalent about America could easily become an extremist based on their interaction with American soldiers.”

On the chain of command:
“The soldiers and marines are just doing their jobs, doing what they were trained for or what they were told to do when they got over there. Things that seem really horrible just become routine – and they are implicitly or explicitly condoned, or encouraged, by the commanders and the policy-makers.”

April 21, 2008

State of our media

Filed under: Media, Election 2008 @ 1:59 pm

tabloid-5.jpg

This really sums up the depressing media situation in this country right now:

Reporting on the last democratic debate, The Washington Post obsessed over “gaffes, missteps and past statements that could leave them vulnerable in the general election,” including such important issues as Obama’s remarks about small town values, questions about his patriotism and love of the flag, and the incendiary sermons of his former pastor, as well as Clinton’s disproved tales about Bosnia sniper fire.

Much like the actual debate, most of the coverage was devoted to such important election issues.

At the end of the article, they mentioned:

“The debate also touched on Iraq, Iran, the Middle East, taxes, the economy, guns and affirmative action.”

More Propaganda for profit

Filed under: Media @ 11:17 am

Glenn Greenwald, in his commentary on yesterdays Times article (see previous post), does a stellar job of showing how there is nothing truly new about the findings in the Times article - that the times actually reported on this thorny subject back in 2003, and that the only new aspect is the mock ’surprise’ over these revelations.

Furthermore, the Times is as guilty as any other outlet of these deceptions, itself acknowledging that “at least nine” of the Pentagon’s trained military analysts wrote Op-Eds for the NYT itself. Greenwald points out that “many of those same sources were also repeatedly quoted — and still are routinely quoted — in all sorts of NYT news articles on Iraq and other “War on Terrorism” issues, something the article fails to note.”

He summarizes:

“The single most significant factor in American political culture is the incestuous, extensive overlap between our media institutions and government officials. The former is a dependent appendage of the latter far more than they are anything else. This article discloses some new details and proof of how that toxic process functions, but the fact that our major news organizations — with some exceptions — largely serve as government propaganda outlets is not news.”

« Previous PageNext Page »