Red State Renegade

From an article titled: Why Liberals Lie About Sex, by nutbag Kevin McCullough (apparently a radio host), mostly a rant about a new survey finding that teenagers are less sexually active today than several years ago:

“Liberals want your child to have sex. They want this to occur in spite of your religious, health, or parental objections. They are willing to substitute false thinking for solid fact on the consequences of what will happen. And they do so while simultaneously insulting you and your child’s ability to comprehend, discern, and choose behaviors that make the most sense.”

The same crap rag/website had headlines which included:

“Obama: Sex Ed for Tots”
and
“And You Thought There Was No Way Democrats Could Create A 20,000 Percent Tax Increase…”

This crap passes for journalism!

And then you wonder where we as a country are headed?

And why are we in this handbasket?

My head is spinning endlessly. What else is new?

I wish I could be clever or witty about this. But right now I am blown away completely for the 42,768th time since these nutsack wackjobs took office.

This week the notorius DC Madam posted on the internet phone records going back years listing her high end clientele in D.C.

She claimed info was being leaked and possibly manipulated, and that she felt a need to release such info to head that off.

The first big news was that republican Senator David Vitter was a regular customer.

Hmm, what a surprise. Though I guess it’s not as bad as being chair of the senate caucus on exploited children while sending nasty IMs to 16 year old boys in the House page program…

In his apology/admission he said:

“This was a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible…Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and my wife in confession and marriage counseling…Out of respect for my family, I will keep my discussion of the matter there — with God and them. But I certainly offer my deep and sincere apologies to all I have disappointed and let down in any way.”

This guy got his start by replacing former Rep. Bob Livingston, who abruptly resigned after disclosures of numerous affairs in 1998.

At the time, Vitter argued that an extramarital affair was grounds for resignation:

“I think Livingston’s stepping down makes a very powerful argument that Clinton should resign as well and move beyond this mess,” he said. [Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 12/20/98]

In an editorial, he also questioned “whether President Clinton should be impeached and removed from office because he is morally unfit to govern.”

It also appears that he only came out and confessed/apologized to do damage control after a phone call from Hustler publisher Larry Flynt inquiring about his calls to the escort service (Ironically, Flynt also outed Bob Livingston in 1998).

And as is he wasn’t already having a bad week, it appears he was a regular customer at a New Orleans Brothel as well…

Yesterday, Sara Taylor was the latest Bush lackey/DOJ Hot Babe to testify to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the attorney scandal, claiming a rather questionable application of the concept of executive privilege.

According to her, Bush had ordered her to invoke ‘executive privilege’ and speak nothing of the U.S. attorneys, the deliberations about the U.S. attorneys, White House involvement in such deliberations, the external or internal conversations about the U.S. attorneys, blah blah blah.

The end result was that she frustrated lawmakers by appearing to make a true effort to answer questions, yet whenever they entered uncomfortable ground, she invoked that ‘privilege.’

As Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) said at the end of the session:

“Each time the finger points at you, you hide behind your oath to the president!”

But early in the hearing, she made an almost comical Freudian slip. During questioning by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., Taylor testified:

“I took an oath. And I take that oath to the president very seriously.”

Sen. Leahy was aghast. After a break, he asked:

“Did you mean, perhaps, you took an oath to the Constitution?”

UPDATE:

“I know that the president refers to the government being his government — it’s not”

-Pat Leahy, further rebutting the above statement by Sara Taylor