Red State Renegade

April 25, 2007

I was mayor on 9-11! I was mayor on 9-11! I was mayor on 9-11!

Filed under: War on Terror, Election 2008 @ 7:36 am

giuliani.jpg

Rudy Giuliani, 9-11 Mayor and presidential hopeful, in a speech in N.H., had no problem invoking 9-11 and claiming there would be a new 9-11 terror attack if the Dems win in 2008:

“If any Republican is elected president —- and I think obviously I would be the best at this —- we will remain on offense and will anticipate what [the terrorists] will do and try to stop them before they do it”

“But the question is how long will it take and how many casualties will we have?…If we are on defense [with a Democratic president], we will have more losses and it will go on longer.”

“I listen a little to the Democrats and if one of them gets elected, we are going on defense…We will wave the white flag on Iraq. We will cut back on the Patriot Act, electronic surveillance, interrogation and we will be back to our pre-Sept. 11 attitude of defense.”

“The Democrats do not understand the full nature and scope of the terrorist war against us.”

“America will be safer with a Republican president.”

“This war ends when they stop coming here to kill us!…Never, ever again will this country ever be on defense waiting for [terrorists] to attack us if I have anything to say about it. And make no mistake, the Democrats want to put us back on defense!”

“[Terrorists] hate us and not because of anything bad we have done; it has nothing to do with Israel and Palestine. They hate us for the freedoms we have and the freedoms we want to share with the world.”

“They came here and killed us in 1993 [with the first attack on New York’s World Trade Center, in which six people died], and we didn’t get it…We didn’t get it that this was a war. Then Sept. 11, 2001, happened, and we got it.”

April 24, 2007

Language of ‘backpedaling’

Filed under: Courts, Gonzales @ 8:32 am

large_wheel_unicycle.jpg

BACKPEDAL
[back-ped·al] – verb (used without object)
“to retreat from or reverse one’s previous stand on any matter; shift ground: to back-pedal after severe criticism.”

ALL these are from Alberto Gonzales opening statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. These don’t even include his defensive answers to some pretty aggressive questions (though not aggressive enough):

I apologize to [the fired attorneys] and to their families…

I am sorry for my missteps…

I have nothing to hide…

Nothing improper occurred here…

I may be somewhat limited when it comes to providing you with all of the facts…

The process by which these U.S. Attorneys were asked to resign could have – and should have – been handled differently…

I made mistakes…

In hindsight, I would have handled this differently…

I should have done more personally…

I never sought to mislead or deceive the Congress or the American people about my role in this matter…

I do acknowledge however that at times I have been less than precise with my words…

I misspoke…

My statement about “discussions” was imprecise and overbroad…

I certainly understand why these statements generated confusion, and I regret that…

This process could have been handled much better and for that I want to apologize publicly…

April 20, 2007

Alberto’s debut gets slammed!

Filed under: Courts, Gonzales @ 11:21 am

For weeks now we have been hearing about the extraordinary effort spent by sitting Attorney General (and Guantanomo cheerleader) Alberto Gonzales, in preparation for his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week.

According to the Washington Post he has ‘retreated from public view’ to spend hours in mock testimony sessions in an effort to anticipate his big day and, ultimately, save his job.

So why, on his first day of testimony, would he state at least 45 times that he could not recall events he was asked about?

Imagine if he didn’t prep! Even Arlen Specter pretended to be on the attack:

Specter: I assume you are well-prepared for this hearing…

Gonzales: I prepare for every hearing, sir.

Specter: Well do you prepare for your press conferences, Like the one where you said you had no involvement?

Reviews were poor for his first day. According to the NY times:

“If Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had gone to the Senate yesterday to convince the world that he ought to be fired, it’s hard to imagine how he could have done a better job, short of simply admitting the obvious: that the firing of eight United States attorneys was a partisan purge.”

The Boy King speaks…

Filed under: Iraq, War on Terror, Bush @ 7:43 am

joe-george-bush-picture-16.jpg

The Boy king gave a speech in Ohio yesterday, in which he was particularly entertaining. As always, it would be comical if it wasn’t so sad.

For example, when asked about similarities between Iraq and Vietnam, the first thought that came to mind was:

“There are some similarities, of course — death is terrible.”

Other pearls of wisdom:

On being married: “A good marriage is really good after serving together in Washington, D.C.”

“Politics comes and goes, but your principles don’t. And everybody wants to be loved — not everybody. … You never heard anybody say, `I want to be despised, I’m running for office.’”

“The best thing about my family is my wife. She is a great first lady. I know that sounds not very objective, but that’s how I feel. And she’s also patient. Putting up with me requires a lot of patience.”

“There are jobs Americans aren’t doing. … If you’ve got a chicken factory, a chicken-plucking factory, or whatever you call them, you know what I’m talking about.”

“I’ve been in politics long enough to know that polls just go poof at times.”

In the speech, supposedly centered on terrorism, the young king was a bit scattered:

Bush told the story about how his first presidential decision was to pick a rug for the Oval Office, a task he quickly cast to his wife. He told her to make sure the rug reflected optimism “because you can’t make decisions unless you’re optimistic that the decisions you make will lead to a better tomorrow.”

Later, when he talked about his hope for succeeding in Iraq, Bush said, “Remember the rug?”

April 16, 2007

[im-peech] - to accuse (a public official) before an appropriate tribunal of misconduct in office

Filed under: Bush, Impeachment @ 6:44 am

mr-rogers.jpg

For four years now I have had a ‘google news alert’ set for the word ‘impeach.’ This feature of google news alerts you on a daily basis of all newspaper mentions of a particular word or phrase.

Four years ago the word ‘impeach’ must have been off-limits to media and even democratic politicians. I would receive my alert each day but it was hardly worth examining - to me it became pretty much another piece of junk mail, and in moments of lowest hope I considered cancelling the alert.

Over time (and especially lately), discussion of impeachment has gone from various leftie ‘rants’ (which the media painted as ‘crazy talk’)…to an occassional mention of the word…to serious discussion.

Now a number of local governments have passed resolutions to consider impeachment.

It’s really mind-blowing to me that this would even be a controversy - after all, proof is not needed for the impeachment process to be initiated, because the process itself is an investigation (And I won’t even discuss the Clinton impeachment).

Why would they fear an investigation if it was truly frivolous, especially if it would absolve their guys and make the lefties look foolish? Because they know that if these guys were seriously investigated, they would go down.

The increasing demand for the possibility of impeachment can be seen in the size and variety of my Google alerts for ‘impeach.’

From friday:

Fairbanks, Alaska:

“You know the Neocons are in trouble when truckers in Texas want “Impeach Bush” buttons.”

From Nyack, New York:

“It’s the executive branch gone wild…It’s not about Bush. It’s about restoring balance to our country. It’s really about future presidents.”

From Salem, Oregon:

“Our so-called president and his sidekicks started this stupid, reckless catastrophe which will never end..Our $200,000-each congressmen need to rise up and impeach this guy and try him for war crimes…This war will never end until Bush is stopped.”

From Brattleboro, Vermont:

“When the story of our time is written by future historians, there will be but one question asked: When confronted with the malevolence and mendacity of the Bush administration, how did the people in positions to do something about it react?”

April 14, 2007

You can’t call yourself a patriot if you’re not outraged!

Filed under: Bush, Books @ 7:53 am

Lee Iacoocca, best known for his turnaround of the Chrysler company in the 1980s, has co-written a new book called Where Have All the Leaders Gone?

Interestingly, Iacocca, a lifelong republican, friend of Ronald Reagan, and supporter of G.W. Bush in the 2000 election, supported John Kerry in 2004.

In the new book, he backs my contention that anyone willing to open their eyes and ears should be outraged:

Had Enough?

Am I the only guy in this country who’s fed up with what’s happening? Where the hell is our outrage? We should be screaming bloody murder. We’ve got a gang of clueless bozos steering our ship of state right over a cliff, we’ve got corporate gangsters stealing us blind, and we can’t even clean up after a hurricane much less build a hybrid car. But instead of getting mad, everyone sits around and nods their heads when the politicians say, “Stay the course.”

Stay the course? You’ve got to be kidding. This is America, not the damned Titanic. I’ll give you a sound bite: Throw the bums out!

You might think I’m getting senile, that I’ve gone off my rocker, and maybe I have. But someone has to speak up. I hardly recognize this country anymore. The President of the United States is given a free pass to ignore the Constitution, tap our phones, and lead us to war on a pack of lies. Congress responds to record deficits by passing a huge tax cut for the wealthy (thanks, but I don’t need it). The most famous business leaders are not the innovators but the guys in handcuffs. While we’re fiddling in Iraq, the Middle East is burning and nobody seems to know what to do. And the press is waving pom-poms instead of asking hard questions. That’s not the promise of America my parents and yours traveled across the ocean for. I’ve had enough. How about you?

I’ll go a step further. You can’t call yourself a patriot if you’re not outraged. This is a fight I’m ready and willing to have.

My friends tell me to calm down. They say, “Lee, you’re eighty-two years old. Leave the rage to the young people.” I’d love to—as soon as I can pry them away from their iPods for five seconds and get them to pay attention. I’m going to speak up because it’s my patriotic duty. I think people will listen to me. They say I have a reputation as a straight shooter. So I’ll tell you how I see it, and it’s not pretty, but at least it’s real. I’m hoping to strike a nerve in those young folks who say they don’t vote because they don’t trust politicians to represent their interests. Hey, America, wake up. These guys work for us.

…Hey, I’m not trying to be the voice of gloom and doom here. I’m trying to light a fire. I’m speaking out because I have hope. I believe in America. In my lifetime I’ve had the privilege of living through some of America’s greatest moments. I’ve also experienced some of our worst crises—the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Kennedy assassination, the Vietnam War, the 1970s oil crisis, and the struggles of recent years culminating with 9/11.

If I’ve learned one thing, it’s this: You don’t get anywhere by standing on the sidelines waiting for somebody else to take action. Whether it’s building a better car or building a better future for our children, we all have a role to play. That’s the challenge I’m raising in this book. It’s a call to action for people who, like me, believe in America.

It’s not too late, but it’s getting pretty close. So let’s shake off the horseshit and go to work. Let’s tell ‘em all we’ve had enough.

5,000,000 White House Emails LOST?

Filed under: Courts, Bush, Gonzales, Conspiracy, Corruption @ 12:30 am

These guys are out and out crooks and they have no shame:

See Rove E-Mail Sought by Congress May Be Missing

According to CREW (Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington), the missing emails total over 5,000,000!

If this doesn’t turn into a new Watergate for them, we are truly in trouble…

Justice Department - Lying sacks of shit, part 4,356

Filed under: Courts, Corruption @ 12:18 am

Kyle Sampson, Chief of Staff to Alberto Gonzales, who resigned last month, was asked two weeks ago under oath by Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) whether he had specific replacements in mind for seven of the prosecutors before they were fired on Dec. 7.

“I personally did not,” Sampson replied. “On December 7th, I did not have in mind any replacements for any of the seven who were asked to resign.”

He claimed that only one of the ‘replacement’ attorneys had been chosen at the time of the firings.

As a general rule (more so than ever): If a “Bushie’s” lips are moving, he is lying.

So today, Sampson himself was exposed (via emails from January and June 2006) in sending around lists of replacement candidates for such attorneys.

In the words of Senator Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.):

“These documents uncover one of the most central and disconcerting contradictions we’ve seen so far…We have been told that there were no backups in mind to replace the fired U.S. attorneys, and these documents make it clear that there were.”

I’m sitting here reading the headlines sipping a red wine that I have never heard of from a cheap juice glass…But right now it could be Night Train in this glass and it would still taste like a fine Bordeaux…

April 13, 2007

McCain flip-flops on Iraq crazy talk….

Filed under: Middle East, Iraq, McCain @ 11:54 pm

NOT - This is old news now but I found today that I wrote it and never posted it…I think it’s important because I truly view this as the beginning of the end for John McCain.

It’s all downhill from here:

From Reuters news:

“U.S. Senator John McCain said in an interview to be broadcast on Sunday [on 60 Minutes] he misspoke in his recent upbeat comments about security in Baghdad, where he traveled under heavy military protection.”

He also acknowledged the use of heavy security for his ‘walk,’ but maintained that things still are improving in Baghdad because of the ’surge.’

How ironic that the originator of the ’straight talk express’ bus has become such an obvious flip flopper. This is the guy who reprtedly came very close to switching to the democratic party in the 2004 elections. Worse, John Kerry claims that McCain came to him and asked to run as his VP for the 2004 election!

Wolfowitz has holes in his shoes…and girlfriend problems

Filed under: Corruption @ 11:46 pm

Wolfowitz - The Ultimate loser - One of the main neo-con architects of our present disaster in Iraq, and now head of the World Bank (Who’s idea was that? - Oh never mind).

Now he finds himself exposed in hiring his own girlfriend and giving her rapid pay raises, to the tune of $200,000, without consulting the board or the ethics committee:

The association representing the World Bank’s 10,000 staff said the embattled Wolfowitz had “destroyed” the trust of employees and should quit.

“He must act honorably and resign,” the de facto union said in a letter to staff, according to contents confirmed to AFP.

“The president must acknowledge that his conduct has compromised the integrity and effectiveness of the World Bank Group and has destroyed the staff trust in his leadership,” the staff association said.

Can these guys do anything right? He can’t even dress himself – look at the socks he was wearing with this nice suit when he had to take his shoes off:

banco.jpg

Kind of a good metaphor for the administration in general – clean and proper on the outside, but on the inside they are full of holes and have no shame.

Just days ago, Wolfowitz was denying and defending his nepotism at the world bank - now he is admitting mistakes and trying to save his job.

He thought he could get away with this because he’s an arrogant bastard. Arrogant because they’ve gotten away with anything and EVERYTHING here at home. But on the world stage these guys have no credibility at all.

The other employees were pissed off and made some noise (in just the same way the American people and their representatives should be doing).

And outright denial doesn’t work in the rest of the world.

Next Page »